|
|
Needs work |
Fair |
Strong |
Excellent |
|
Organization of Presentation |
Audience cannot understand presentation because
there is no sequence of information. |
Audience has difficulty following presentation
because student jumps around. |
Student presents information in logical sequence
which audience can follow. |
Student presents information in logical,
interesting sequence which audience can follow. |
|
Subject Knowledge / Factual Accuracy |
Historical facts are missing from presentation or
wrong |
Facts provided are often inaccurate presentation |
Some vagueness or minor inaccuracies in the facts
presented |
Total historical accuracy. High level of detail
provided in presentation |
|
Ability to answer questions |
Student does not have grasp of information; student
cannot answer questions about subject. |
Student is uncomfortable with information and is
able to answer only rudimentary questions, but fails to elaborate |
Student appeared at ease and answeed most questions
with explanations and some elaboration |
Student was able to answer all questions with
explanations and elaboration. |
|
Visual Aids |
Student either had no visual aids or visual aids
contained many (4 or more) mechanical errors (typos, grammatical errors
etc.). |
Student prepared visual aids, but those aids did
not really support the presentation and/ or presentation had some (2 or
3) mechanical errors |
Student's visual aids relate to presentation.
Presentation has no more than two misspellings and/or grammatical errors |
Student's visual aids explain and reinforce
presentation. Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors |
|
Presentation techniques |
Student makes no eye contact and only reads from
notes. Oral presentation was mumbled, with many terms pronounced
incorrectly, making it hard for most of the class to hear or understand
what was said. |
Student occasionally makes eye contact, but mostly
reads from notes. Student's voice is low and some words are
mispronounced. Presentation was hard to hear for much of the audience
|
Student maintains eye contact most of the time but
frequently returns to notes. Student's voice and pronunciations were
mostly correct and most of the audience could hear the presentation.
|
Students makes good eye contact, rarely referring
to notes. Clear voice and pronunciation. Easily audible to entire
audience. |
|
Attitude / behavior |
Rarely willing to work. Not focused during group
work and presentations. |
Sometimes willing to work. Sometimes focused
during group work and presentations. |
Usually willing to work. Usually focused during
group work and presentations. |
Always willing to work. Highly focused during
group work and presentations. |
|
Listening |
Projects lack of interest or
disrespect for others |
Often displays lack of interest
in comments of others |
Sometimes displays lack of interest
in comments of others |
Actively and respectfully
listens to peers and instructor |
|
Quality of Contributions |
Comments reflect little understanding of either the
assignment or previous remarks of others in class, |
Comments sometimes irrelevant, betray lack of
preparation, or indicate lack of attention to previous remarks of other
students |
Comments are relevant and reflect understanding of
medieval feudal life and good attention to previous remarks of other
students |
Comments are unusually insightful reflecting deep
understanding of medieval feudal life and careful attention to previous
remarks of other students |
|
Frequency of Contributions |
Seldom participates and is generally not engaged |
Sometimes participates but at other times is "tuned
out" |
Usually participates but is occasionally
distracted, or may not always respond at appropriate times |
Actively participates at appropriate times |